What is a critical aspect of groupthink?

What is a critical aspect of groupthink?

• A. The promotion of diverse perspectives
• B. The suppression of dissenting viewpoints
• C. The encouragement of independent thinking
• D. The focus on individual decision-making

Answer: (B)

A critical aspect of groupthink is the suppression of dissenting viewpoints. This psychological phenomenon occurs when the desire for harmony or conformity within a group leads to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcomes. In the context of groupthink, members often prioritize consensus over critical analysis, which results in an environment where dissenting opinions are discouraged or ignored. This suppression can prevent the group from fully exploring alternatives or considering the risks associated with their decisions, ultimately leading to poor outcomes. In contrast, promoting diverse perspectives, encouraging independent thinking, and focusing on individual decision-making are all characteristics that would counteract groupthink. Such practices would facilitate a healthier decision-making process, allowing for critical evaluation and the integration of different viewpoints. However, in scenarios where groupthink is present, these positive aspects are typically absent, leading to a narrow, consensus-driven approach.

A critical aspect of groupthink is the suppression of dissenting viewpoints. This psychological phenomenon occurs when the desire for harmony or conformity within a group leads to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcomes. In the context of groupthink, members often prioritize consensus over critical analysis, which results in an environment where dissenting opinions are discouraged or ignored. This suppression can prevent the group from fully exploring alternatives or considering the risks associated with their decisions, ultimately leading to poor outcomes.

In contrast, promoting diverse perspectives, encouraging independent thinking, and focusing on individual decision-making are all characteristics that would counteract groupthink. Such practices would facilitate a healthier decision-making process, allowing for critical evaluation and the integration of different viewpoints. However, in scenarios where groupthink is present, these positive aspects are typically absent, leading to a narrow, consensus-driven approach.